Are You Tired, Yet, of the Chosen People's Parsing of Genocide and What Is and What Isn't Jew True Blue?

More "Unsubscribed" shit holes on this/my Substack for calling the Raping Murdering Straving Polluting Poisoning Maiming Thieving Zionists in Israel Jews! Fuck.

I am not paying anything toward’s this New York Jew’s condo, but his Substack “tease” says it all: CAN BIDEN REIN BIBI IN? As Israel sets its sights on Iran, the US declares nuclear targets out of bounds by Seymour Hersh/ Oct 16

Hersh: “This week, according to a report in the Washington Post, an active and fully involved President Joe Biden finally set a limit on what Israel could do with the untold numbers of American bombs that Israel has recently been dropping on Gaza, the West Bank, and Lebanon. The Israeli government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been debating how and when to respond to an earlier Iranian missile attack on Israel and an anxious world has been watching as the military madness of the Middle East, fueled by American weapons, continues to escalate...”

He’s a Jewish Joke, and he’s landed on Substack, and his retirement and investments are now supplemented with his grand sage advice and insight. It’s a Jewish Project, and he will never talk about it as the Zyklon Blinken and Emoff Way (watch the Harris hubby, man, he applauds and whoops it up when supporting the wench when she says, “toughtest and most advance military in the world . . . that’s what Joe Biden and I are doing”).

Fucking stupid Jews:

Meta (Jew Zuckerberg) bans RT days after U.S. accused Russian outlet of disinformation

U.S. officials accused RT last week of carrying out covert information warfare operations around the world as an arm of Russia's spy agencies.

The dumbing of AmeriKKKa, dumb downing from what?

U.S. officials allege that in Africa, RT is behind an online platform called “African Stream” but hides its role; that in Germany, it secretly runs a Berlin-based English-language site known as “Red"; and that in France, it hired a journalist in Paris to carry out “influence projects” aimed at a French-speaking audience.

The Biden administration is imposing sanctions on a state-funded broadcaster that oversees RT, TV-Novosti; another state media company, Rossiya Segodnya; and its director, Dmitry Kiselyov, officials said.

The U.S. has previously accused Russia of trying to interfere in U.S. elections by sowing discord and division, and in 2018, the U.S. Justice Department announced indictments against 12 Russian nationals alleging cybercrimes intended to interfere with the 2016 election — including hacking Democratic National Committee computers and stealing emails.

The Shock Troops of Propaganda: BBC News for Overseas Listeners

Abstract

During the 1930s, British broadcasters and policymakers came to agree that the BBC could best support British foreign policy interests by broadcasting truthful, objective news—or, at least, news which seemed to be so. The BBC began international news broadcasting in 1930, as part of the experimental short-wave service aimed at expatriate listeners in the colonies. Bulletins mixed political and economic news for imperial administrators with items intended to provide a sense of connection with ‘home’. The BBC broadcast news provided by the news agency Reuters. Broadcasting this news across borders threatened to disrupt the restrictive practices upon which much of the news industry relied, and careful negotiation between the BBC, Reuters, and newspapers in various parts of the British Empire was necessary. During the latter part of the 1930s, Reuters’ position in several crucial news markets began to deteriorate. The British government turned to the BBC as a means to provide Reuters with support and covert subsidies, and also to broadcast news from British sources direct to key areas, such as Latin America, in order to underpin British influence and compete with state-supported news services from fascist countries and formidable commercial services from the US. The Foreign Office also exerted influence over the content of BBC news broadcasts, preventing the transmission of bad news from Palestine, circulating official reports from British officials in the Middle East, and limiting coverage of the plight of Germany’s Jews.

Cunts of the MI6 and CIA =

Why is Israel intensifying its crackdown on media coverage?

Western coverage of Gaza: A textbook case of coloniser’s journalism

Gaza and the death of Western journalism

As Israel pounds Gaza, BBC journalists accuse broadcaster of bias

Ten journalists who have covered the war on Gaza for two of the world’s leading news networks, CNN and the BBC, have revealed the inner workings of those outlets’ newsrooms from October 7 onward, alleging pro-Israel bias in coverage, systematic double standards and frequent violations of journalistic principles.

Over the past year, experts and veteran journalists have increasingly accused top Western media outlets of maintaining a pro-Israel bias while dehumanising Palestinians and minimising their suffering.

A small number of journalists at The New York Times and the BBC have resigned publicly, citing their consciences. Others have tried to change things from the inside with campaigns and internal meetings.

“This is a moment in history that we don’t often see where we actually see genocide being perpetrated as it’s happening,” Craig Mokhiber, a United Nations human rights official who resigned last year over the organisation’s response to Israel’s war in Gaza, told Al Jazeera.

“In a situation where Western governments like the United States, the UK and others have been complicit, you’ve got Western media that have actually become a part of the mechanism of genocide. That’s what’s different. That’s what’s frightening.”

Egyptian surgeon-turned-comedian Basser Youssef summed it up brilliantly in his second interview with Piers Morgan, observing that whenever something happens in Israel-Palestine, people consider it a “complicated situation” and do not know what is happening. 

When the media has been covering a 75-year-long conflict with all its resources and expertise, Youssef says, and people have the exact same reaction every time, that is a failure of the media apparatus. “Because why does it seem, every time this happens, like it is happening from point zero?”

Why journalists are speaking out against Western media bias in reporting on Israel-Palestine

Source: An open letter on U.S. media coverage of Palestine

Quoting:

Finding truth and holding the powerful to account are core principles of journalism.

Yet for decades, our news industry has abandoned those values in coverage of Israel and Palestine. We have failed our audiences with a narrative that obscures the most fundamental aspects of the story: Israel’s military occupation and its system of apartheid.

For the sake of our readers and viewers — and the truth — we have a duty to change course immediately and end this decades-long journalistic malpractice. The evidence of Israel’s systematic oppression of Palestinians is overwhelming and must no longer be sanitized.

In April, Human Rights Watch released a 213-page report that documented Israeli authorities committing “crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution.” Leading Israeli human rights group B’tselem characterized the region as governed by a regime of ethnic supremacy.

These terms — apartheid, persecution, ethnic supremacy — are increasingly gaining institutional recognition after years of Palestinian advocacy, and we, as journalists, need to examine whether our coverage reflects that reality.

Take, for example, the language used in the recent coverage of East Jerusalem neighborhood Sheikh Jarrah. Media outlets often refer to forced displacement of Palestinians living there — illegal under international law and potentially a war crime — as “evictions.”

This term misleadingly implies a real estate “dispute” between tenant and landlord, an inaccurate depiction of the state of affairs. The United Nations considers East Jerusalem occupied Palestinian territory, meaning Israel’s territorial claims there are not recognized. More importantly, using the term ignores the well-documented aim of the Israeli government to establish and maintain ethnic dominance over Palestinians.

During the last few days of Ramadan, Israeli forces violently attacked worshippers at the Al Aqsa mosque compound with tear gas and rubber-tipped bullets. Journalists didn’t call this an “attack” or “assault” on Palestinians, but rather a “clash,” as if both sides shared equal culpability and agency in the escalation.

When Israel attacked Gaza, media outlets framed it as a “conflict” between two equal entities, ignoring the total asymmetry in power. Under the guise of objectivity, rockets fired at Israel — which caused significantly less damage than Israeli airstrikes — were covered just as much as Israel attacking medical facilities and leveling entire residential buildings, clouding the nearly one-sided scale of violence and destruction.

The asymmetry in context does not just extend to the language we use; stories tend to disproportionately amplify Israeli narratives while suppressing Palestinian ones.

Too often, media outlets uncritically repeat Israeli military claims about its assault on Gaza without asking for evidence or proof, despite clear examples where Israeli officials spread false information. Journalists reported the claim from Israeli forces that they had launched a ground invasion — that was false.

The human toll caused by Israel’s bombardment is indisputable: Hundreds dead, more than 65 of them children. While statements made by Israeli officials and their defenders justifying the killing of civilians went unchallenged, Palestinian civilians had their humanity interrogated: Journalists asked whether they support violence or Hamas rockets.

Troubling still, reporting wanes considerably when Israel halts its airstrikes. Palestinians are ignored in so-called times of “peace” despite attacks and other hostile aspects of life under occupation continuing after the ceasefire.

Though there have been exceptions that accurately reflect the plight of many Palestinians, they are few and far between.

As journalists, we are entrusted with a profoundly important mission in a free and democratic society, the power to inform the people and guide the national conversation, from the family dinner table to Capitol Hill.

We are calling on journalists to tell the full, contextualized truth without fear or favor, to recognize that obfuscating Israel’s oppression of Palestinians fails this industry’s own objectivity standards.

We have an obligation — a sacred one — to get the story right. Every time we fail to report the truth, we fail our audiences, our purpose and, ultimately, the Palestinian people.

Consider the record of recent weeks and months:

• Israel’s prime minister, while standing on stage at the UN general assembly, denounced the body as “contemptible”, a “house of darkness” and a “swamp of antisemitic bile”.

• Israel’s outgoing ambassador to the UN shredded a copy of the UN charter with a miniature paper shredder while also standing at the podium of the general assembly, and later said the UN headquarters in New York “should be closed and wiped off the face of the Earth”.

• Israel’s foreign minister falsely accused the UN secretary general of not having condemned Iran’s attacks on Israel, declared him “persona non grata in Israel” and announced that he had “banned him from entering the country”.

• The Israeli government actively obstructed a UN-mandated commission of inquiry trying to collect evidence on the 7 October attacks.

• Israel’s parliament is in the process of designating a longstanding UN agency, UNRWA, as a “terrorist organization”.

• The Israeli military has bombed UN schools, warehouses and refugee camps in Gaza for 12 consecutive months, and killed a record 228 UN employees in the process.

• The Israeli military is now also attacking UN peacekeepers in southern Lebanon.

How is any of this OK? Acceptable? Legal?

Perhaps the biggest question of all: how is Israel still allowed to remain a member of the UN? Why has it not yet been expelled from an organization that it is relentlessly and shamelessly attacking and undermining? (Hasan)

[Nearly all the publicly available information on U.S. arms transfers to Israel comes from leaks reported by the media. The Biden administration says very little about the weapons it delivers to Israel or how the Israeli military uses them]

These are Sy Hersh’s people:

"People are burning in front of us." Palestinians were seen burning alive after Israeli forces attacked tents within the grounds of the Al Aqsa hospital in Gaza's Deir al-Balah region. The tents were housing displaced Palestinians who had nowhere else to go. Journalist Saleh al Jafarawi recorded the scenes as it happened, explaining that they had nothing to extinguish the flames. At least 3 people were killed and 40 injured according to early reports from local media.

Robert Fisk and his widow.

There are no journalists on TV anymore.

Cunts.

Cunt.

“I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within,” the former president told Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo when she asked if he expects “chaos on Election Day” from immigrants. “We have some very bad people, some sick people, radical left lunatics…. And it should be easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.”

Throughout his campaign, Trump has laid out a dystopian vision for America where the military uses violence to detain and deport immigrants, suppress protests, and target criminals. He has used fascistic, violent language and recently repeated his vow to be a “dictator” for “one day” if elected.

At a rally last year in Iowa, Trump promised to use federal forces to “get crime out of our cities.” He went on to say that Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, and San Francisco were “crime dens” run by Democrats. As Rolling Stone reported, during his time in the White House, Trump became enamored with the idea of using mass executions against gang members and drug kingpins.

More cunts: Kamala Harris supports weapons for Israel and vows tougher approach on migration/ In sit-down with CNN’s Dana Bash, vice-president defends shifts on policy issues and her support for Biden

The White House hosted a roundtable session on Wednesday to discuss the rise of antisemitism in the US. Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff, who is Jewish, led the event.

“I'm proud to be Jewish, I am proud to live openly as a Jew, and I'm not afraid,” he told participants, adding: “I will not live in fear.”

Emhoff was joined by Jewish leaders from the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, the American Jewish Committee (AJC), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Chabbad, the National Council of Jewish Women (NCJW), and the Orthodox Union (OU), among other groups.

Several Senior administration officials, including Ambassador Susan Rice, White House Domestic Policy Advisor, Keisha Lance Bottoms, Senior Advisor to the President for Public Engagement, Shelley Greeenspan, White House Jewish Liaison, and Ambassador Deborah Lipstadt, Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism, represented the White House.

Now look at this Jewish feces Jewish Chronicle story: Doug Emhoff’s Jewishness can’t hide what a Harris administration would mean for Jews and Israel

First Jew, Second Gentleman, Third Rate

Doug Emhoff is a Hebraic fig leaf, covering not just the obscene aspects of the Democratic left’s street thuggery, but also the Biden-Harris administration’s cynical failure to walk its pro-Israel talk in Israel’s war for survival against the Iranian Axis.

This is a lot to bear, even for a man of Emhoff’s solid stature. Nothing suggests he has the substance. Emhoff isn’t a heavyweight historian like Deborah Lipstadt, the administration’s Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism. He’s an LA lawyer for a firm whose clients have included Al Jazeera and the banking arm of the Palestinian Authority.

Emhoff went through the twin ordeals of Jewish American adolescence, a Reform bar mitzvah and a summer camp. His first wife wasn’t Jewish. It seems that the marriage broke down when he had an affair with their nanny. She wasn’t Jewish, either. Neither are his two children, Ella and Cole.

Ella Emhoff let it be known in 2020 that she is not Jewish. A fashionista and socialist influencer, Emhoff responded to the October 7 massacres by calling on her followers to donate to Unrwa. It’s a free country and all that, but it’s hardly to Doug’s credit in his new gig as First Jew.

He has no expertise in antisemitism, but somehow he’s the politically-correct face of the program in media damage control that is the administration’s “Antisemitism Task Force”.

Readers with long memories and a sick bag will recall that in 2008, Obama’s Jewish supporters assured their fellow Jews that he’d never do a number on Israel because he got it “in his kishkes”. Look how that went.