Converso Leibowitz is Back on Fucking Cable TV: Genocide is Genocide/Mass Murder/ Mass Starvation/ Mass Dehydration: Israel's Final Solution
... how many Jews does it take to run Hollywood, Wall Street, Academia, Press, Media, Banking, Finance, Real Estate, War???? Zyclon B -- ZYCLON BLINKEN!
Confucius once said, “The beginning of all wisdom is to call things by their proper names.”
No. KFC was not invented by a Jewish colonel from Kentucky.
Sanders is, in fact, one of a category of names that often are authentically Jewish but also look identical to some typically non-Jewish surnames. “Sanders” is one if these.
“Sanders” or “Sender”, “Sanderson” and variations thereof, are authentic Yiddish surnames derived from the name “Alexander”. Now, Alexander the Great was not Jewish, but he was good to the Jews and our ancestors promised to honour him by giving his name to our children. Because of this, variations of the name “Alexander” have become absorbed into Judaism.
Other names which can equally be either Jewish or non-Jewish are “Gordon”, “Miller”, “Fisher”, and “Freedman” to name just a few. Yiddish, like English, is a Germanic language and, by coincidence, some words in Yiddish happen to be identical in English.
Genocide General Bernie Sanders!
Stewart was born Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz at Doctors Hospital in the Upper East Side of New York City. His father Donald Leibowitz (1931–2013) was an energy coordinator for the New Jersey Department of the Treasury, and his mother Marian Leibowitz (née Laskin) was a teacher and later an educational consultant. Stewart's family is Ashkenazi Jewish (Polish-Jewish, Ukrainian-Jewish, Belarusian-Jewish, and possibly Lithuanian-Jewish); his parents had immigrated to the United States from Europe. One of his grandfathers was born in Manzhouli, present-day China. He is the second of four sons, with older brother Lawrence and younger brothers Dan and Matthew.
Stool samples:
Stool Samples: The 7 Jewish actresses who shaped Hollywood as we know it: Zionists!
Fucking lying Jews: Kirk Douglas: Zionist Extradinaire!
Jews? Thespians? Liars? Zionists!!!!
THE FINAL SOLUTION:
The Israeli government is using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare in the Gaza Strip, which is a war crime.
Israeli officials have made public statements expressing their aim to deprive civilians in Gaza of food, water, and fuel – statements reflected in Israeli forces’ military operations.
These Nazi’s in Israel are not just shadows of Nazi Germany: The Nazis’ Nightmarish Plan to Starve the Soviet Union/ Before the infamous Wannsee conference, Nazis had another meeting during which they planned the mass starvation of millions of Eastern Europeans.
Listen to Sidney Blumenthal’s son call Israeli Jews Nazis, and listen to him describe the starvation of Gazans another Jewish FInal Solution, and of course, food and water and forcing folks to flee, taking away all clinics and hospitals, all of that, the Jewish Zyclon B.
Academic Norman Finkelstein on Gaza, "the World's Largest Concentration Camp"
This from 2018, with Jeremy Scahill:
JS: When you say that it was entirely predictable, what do you mean?
NF: Well the Israelis said they were going to kill the people when they attempted to breach the prison gate. The people inside the prison said they’re going to try to break out of the prison. It doesn’t take rocket science to figure out what’s going to happen in that scenario.
JS: When you say prison, what are you referring to?
NF: I don’t want to get too pedantic about this, but Confucius once said, “The beginning of all wisdom is to call things by their proper names.” That might sound like a fortune cookie entry, but in fact it’s a pretty profound idea. It took me a long time to sort of come to grips with it, or for it to be processed by my mind.
So, in the case at hand, if you look at the mainstream publications which echo Israeli propaganda, or if you just look at the Times, they keep referring to a border fence. A border fence is if two sovereign states stand on each side of that fence.
But then let’s look at the facts: Early back in 2003, the Hebrew university sociologist Baruch Kimmerling, he was a distinguished sociologist, now when I say back in 2003, bear in mind that the blockade, the intensity of the blockade, was notched up in 2006 after the elections that brought Hamas to power. So, when Kimmerling was speaking, it was before the intensity of the blockade had set in, and he described Gaza as, and now I’m quoting him, “the world’s largest concentration camp ever.”
The respected Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz, they refer to the “Gaza Ghetto,” with the obvious resonances for Jews, the Warsaw Ghetto.
And then if you take the conservative British Prime Minister David Cameron, he referred to Gaza as an open-air prison.
So, is it accurate, is it calling things by their proper names to say that the Palestinians in Gaza are trying to breach a border fence? No. Palestinians in Gaza are trying to breach a concentration camp fence. They’re trying to breach a ghetto fence. They’re trying to breach a prison gate.
But that’s only half the story. Because it’s not even a prison. It’s not even, in my opinion, it’s not even a concentration camp. I don’t want to get overly technical about this, but the Nazis had two different kinds of camps — the concentration camps which go back to the Boer War in South Africa, and then there are the extermination camps, which is something apart. Not always apart, in camps like Majdanek and Auschwitz. They combined the two. But then there were just some separate just extermination centers, like Sobibór.
Now, let’s return to Gaza. What are the facts about Gaza?
Number one, beginning in 2012, the United Nations, very staid, dull-witted but competent bureaucrats, began issuing reports. The first one was in the form of the interrogative. It said, “Will Gaza be livable in 2020?”
Then, in 2015, another report was issued by UNCTAD, one of the premier U.N. agencies, and they switched from the interrogative to the declarative. They said, “Gaza, on its current trajectory, will not be livable in 2020.”
Then, in 2017, a senior U.N. official — again, very conservative, proper bureaucrat — said, It seems like our forecasts have been optimistic. Sanguine. He said, “Gaza has crossed the threshold of unlivability a long time ago.”
We’re not talking about poetry. We’re not talking about hyperbole. We’re talking about the assessment, the verdict of very conservative, but professional and competent, U.N. bureaucrats. Gaza is an unlivable space.
What does that mean concretely? Well, let’s take one indicator: 97 percent of Gaza’s water is contaminated. It’s unfit for human consumption.
Well what does that mean? Well, let’s take the opinion of Sara Roy, who is the world’s leading authority on Gaza’s economy. Very bright woman, very decent woman. I know it’s not relevant, but I’ll mention it: Both of her parents were in Auschwitz concentration camp. So, consider her language. She said: “Innocent people, most of them children,” — because Gaza is overwhelmingly, majority children, 51 percent children — “are daily being poisoned.”
And that’s a fact. And people don’t want to hear it, they get all squeamish. Why are you talking about concentration camps? Why are you talking about poisoning? Well, hey! Don’t blame the messenger for the bad news. Concentration camp? That’s Baruch Kimmerling. Poisoned, one million children — there are one million children in Gaza that are being poisoned. Israel poisoning one million children.
So now, let’s get back to the question, calling things by their proper names. Are the people of Gaza trying to breach a border fence? No. The people of Gaza are trying to breach an unlivable space in which the population is daily being poisoned. Those are the facts. And we shouldn’t recoil from those facts. If you could talk about the Syrian government using poison gas, and everybody can get indignant, there may be a question, a reasonable question, about which side used the poison gas, and I’m not about to resolve that question. The point is: Everybody gets indignant. You’re poisoning people!
In our own country, when it was it was discovered that the water in Flint was contaminated, there was a national outcry. National outrage. National indignation.
And now you have a whole population, predominately children, being systematically poisoned. And they have no way out. Which is another feature about Gaza, which sets it apart from the other horrific situations in the world today.
United Nations Relief and Works Agency, UNRWA, it said a couple of years ago, there is something about Gaza that’s distinct, they said. I don’t want to say unique, because we don’t want to get into the Holocaust sweepstakes. Let’s just call it distinct.
They said: Everywhere else in the world, when there’s a natural disaster, say a drought, or a human-made disaster, such as the war in Syria, the people have the option, UNRWA said, at least to move. And that’s not a great option. It means becoming a refugee, and in many cases, it means getting a tent if you’re lucky, and the tent is pitched in mud. But, it’s an option.
The people of Gaza are the only people in the world who don’t have that option. They’re caged in. In those circumstances, to refer to it as a border fence, strikes me as almost obscene. And there’s another obscenity. The obscenity of referring to Israel as using disproportionate force, and/or excessive force, which is what the human rights organizations, as well as, say the U.N. High Commissioner of Human Rights, what they typically say.
Well, the implication of that is, Israel has the right to use proportionate force. Israel has the right to use moderate as against excessive force. People are trapped, and trapped in something that seems to go beyond even a concentration camp. And Israel has the right to use any force? To keep them confined? Israel has the right to use proportionate force? Moderate force? To confine the 1 million children of Gaza in effectively a death camp, where they’re being poisoned everyday?
No, there’s something really wrong about that’s going here. Now, as I said, I’m not going to compare magnitude of crimes. I don’t want to go down that route.
Incidentally, the expression, “Holocaust sweepstakes” doesn’t come from me. It comes from the late University of Chicago Historian, Peter Novick, who said that when Jews and Israelis insist on the fact that the Holocaust is unique, and then the others start weighing in, the Armenians, the Native Americans, they say, “No, ours is just as bad,” it becomes a Holocaust Sweepstakes. And that phrase resonated with me. Read the book 20 years ago, but it stood with me. I don’t want to go down that route. But there something here that’s profoundly wrong.
I was profoundly wrong in my opinion, beyond the martyrdom of the people of Gaza. It’s the squeamishness and the cowardice about calling things, as Confucius said, by their proper name. That’s the least that’s owed the people of Gaza. (NF)
+—+
“You’re no feminist. You’re a white supremacist!”
That’s what a protester had to say to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Friday at a Columbia University-hosted conference on conflict-related sexual violence, where dozens of demonstrators, including feminist scholars, showed up to criticize what they saw as an effort to justify the US’s support of Israel’s war in Gaza. They accused the event’s organizers of using reports of sexual assault by Hamas against Israeli women as a part of that strategy.
When Thomas-Greenfield spoke next, protesters also interrupted her—and called for attendees to walk out. About a quarter did, chanting, “Free, free Palestine” as they moved to block the entrance before eventually filing out.
Outside, I met a group of protesters carrying signs that said, “
“Real feminists don’t massacre Palestinian women!!” and “Stop funding genocide.”
(Pregnant Palestinians have reportedly been miscarrying and struggling to access care amid Israeli airstrikes, as my colleagues and I have reported, and Palestinians more broadly are facing a severe humanitarian crisis, with little access to food, fuel, and medical care.) —Julianne McShane, Mother Jones
An organizer handed me a flier depicting the Columbia event as “an example of colonial feminism” that reinforces tropes about Palestinian men as rapists while ignoring sexual violence against Palestinians. (Scholars and journalists have documented Palestinian men’s and women’s experiences of sexual violence while detained by Israeli forces, and sexual harassment of Palestinian women at Israeli checkpoints. In 2017, meanwhile, a UN Women report found that about 15 percent of married Gazan women had reported sexual abuse by their husbands in the previous year—repeatedly, in more than half of the cases.)
At the building’s entrance, a couple of protesters were handing out copies of what they called “The New York War Times,” which critiqued Gettleman’s story. A police officer pointed me toward two women by the elevators who he said could check me into the event. It turned out they were part of a group of feminist scholars, including some Columbia and Barnard faculty members, who were there to protest. Rebecca Jordan-Young, a professor of women’s, gender and sexuality studies at Barnard, handed me a letter signed by dozens of fellow scholars and writers—including the likes of Angela Davis, Beverly Sheftall, and Chandra Talpede Mohanty—objecting to “the Israeli and US governments and others weaponizing the issue of rape.”
The letter, which, in addition to condemning rape, supported the UN investigation into allegations of sexual violence by both sides and called for a ceasefire, said it ultimately would be delivered to Israeli and American officials.
Jordan-Young, who was among the signatories, called the “framing and timing” of the event “opportunistic” given the US government’s backing of Israel in the war. “Every rape is an outrage, as is the carpet-bombing of civilians,” she told me. “As a feminist scholar, I’m all too aware that both rape and charges of rape have been and continue to be used in the service of racism.” Simply looking at sexual or gender violence in isolation, she added, “can’t generate a sound analysis or sound politics.”
+—+
Blinke, massive WAR Criminal, Zyclon B — ZYCLON BLINKEN!
Daddy Blinken was born on November 11, 1925, in Yonkers, New York, the son of Maurice Blinken and his wife, Ethel (Horowitz) His father and mother were of Jewish descent and his father was from Kiev, the Russian Empire, who, according to Antony Blinken, "fled pogroms in Russia". His grandfather was author Meir Blinken. Blinken had two brothers, Alan and Robert.
The brothers grew up both in New York City and Yonkers. They attended the Horace Mann School. Blinken graduated magna cum laude with a bachelor's degree in economics from Harvard University in 1948, after serving in the United States Army Air Corps during World War II in 1944.
Here, a real man:
Heckling? No, speaking truth to injustice!
Lol, how amazing that these creatures rule so much.Then Hillary ,a mass murderer world-renowned ,smiles while the peasants heckle her. Is she thinking of babies for dinner? Or how she will be enriched when nuclear war comes? Visious and evil just like the rest of them.
But don't dispare, just look at how fun it is to live in interesting times.
“The beginning of all wisdom is to call things by their proper names.”
You definitively understood that. :-)