The Dirt Under Redneck, Jar-head Fucking Scott "Trump BJ" Ritter's Nails

Dangerous, decadent, mediocre "leadership" in the West: USA USI USA USI . . . .

From one presidential candidate — Emanuel Pastreich

The most dangerous executive orders that destroy the rule of law and end all accountability and transparency in government, are:

“REMOVING BARRIERS TO AMERICAN LEADERSHIP IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE”

Opens the door to the takeover of the entire government, and the world by unaccountable IT firms and private intelligence hiding behind the mask of “AI”

“STRENGTHENING AMERICAN LEADERSHIP IN DIGITAL FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY”

Opens the way to Central Bank Digital Currency at the very same time that Trump supposedly rejected it by renaming it as “crypto” and empowering the fusion of IT and private equity to run the economy.

“GUARANTEEING THE STATES PROTECTION AGAINST INVASION”

Laying the foundations for a military government and blurs any distinction between the federal and state governments

“Designating Cartels And Other Organizations As Foreign Terrorist Organizations And Specially Designated Global Terrorists”

Allowing the military to undertake largescale military actions in the United States and to designate any organization chosen by the elites as a military enemy.

“ESTABLISHING AND IMPLEMENTING THE PRESIDENT’S DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY”

Creating an unconstitutional and opaque “department,” which is not actually a department, that is empowered to fire government employees at will for the interest of the billionaires.

All of these executive orders are prefaced with the line:

“By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows”

The executive order has always been problematic in nature, but here it is used to remke by fiat the very nature of the presidency and the legal system. Trump is saying, in essence, what the president says is the law. Or, as Louis XIV supposedly remarked, “

“L'État, c'est moi”

"I am the state"

There are any number of legal challenges being raised, and that legal effort is worthwhile.

I want to go out on a limb, however, and state that ultimately we will find that it is not sufficient to counter each claim of authority by Trump in the courts. We will ultimately have to say that if the president ignores the people, corrupts the law, and degrades the Constitution, well then he is not the president in any sense. If the entire Congress supports the president in his immoral and illegal actions, or takes actions that assume that he is so empowered, then they also lose their legitimacy and authority. There is no sin, and much merit, in condemning a completely bankrupt system in toto.

Fucking Ritter: “How far will President Trump go when it comes to protecting the free speech right of all Americans, and holding to account those officials who have violated them?

On the evening of January 20, 2025, the newly sworn in President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, made his way into the Oval Office of the White House, where he took a seat at the desk recently vacated by his predecessor, Joe Biden. There, Trump proceeded to sign a series of executive orders designed to undo the policies of the Biden administration and set the United States on a new course designed to “Make America Great Again.”

Like millions of Americans, I watched as the president worked his way through the stack of documents, announcing each one before signing off. Of all the executive orders Trump signed off on that night, two resonated with me personally—those dealing with “Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship” and “Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government.”

You see, for the past four years, under the leadership of former President Joe Biden, I have seen my freedom of speech infringed upon by a weaponized federal government. While a candidate for president, Trump had spoken out frequently in defense of free speech. Moreover, having himself been under the crosshairs of federal agents operating at the behest of a politicized judicial branch, Trump had firsthand experience of what it was like to have the government target you simply because it did not agree with your position on certain issues.” — Cocksucker Ritter:

Cunts, one and all, loving that fucking criminal, Rapist Trump:

All of which could, in the end, mean little. There is every reason to believe that Trump will get rolled by the Blob, the Israeli government, the Israel Lobby, and their legions of bought-and-paid for representatives in Congress. There is even good reason to believe that “rolled” is the wrong word here, and that Trump has always been, is now, and will always be subservient to the Blob, including its Israeli corpuscle; and that this move by Trump is just a means of providing respite for the Israeli military before expanding its our mass murder in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Yemen, and Iran. Even this video share can easily be explained away as Trump hearing Sachs criticize Obama, clicking ‘share’, and not listening to the end.

The genocide never stopped, and what happened to Palestine BEFORE Oct. 7. And the carnage. The total polluted lands left by the Jews for the Gazans to return to WHAT?

Strangely, in his press conference of 22 January, Trump also mentions the US$ 500 billion Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stargate project – no mention though of mRNA vaxxes – it will supposedly create thousands of jobs and help making America great again.

But why would President Trump say in the first place that this gigantic Stargate infrastructure project would focus on using AI to manufacture mRNA-technology products, including vaccines?

And that despite his nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for Secretary of Health, the very RFK Jr. who is to Make America Healthy Again (MAHA). The mRNA technology does not make anybody healthy. So, mRNA technology does not really fit into Trump’s MAHA ideology?

Was this discussed with RFK Jr.?

In one way or another, Trump must pay his dues to the [Ashkenazi] Zionists, Big Pharma and Big Tech, and not last nor least, the huge and powerful Military Industrial Complex (MIC), all of whom funded his campaign with almost uncountable millions of dollars.

In this episode of Dispatches, Rania Khalek is joined by author, historian, and journalist Vijay Prashad to discuss how the West’s increasing reliance on violent repression, from Gaza to Cuba, signals not strength, but desperation. Prashad dissects the moral collapse of Western imperialism and the challenges facing the Global South as they navigate an era of “hyperimperial” aggression.

Cunts of Continuing Criminal Enterprise:

Firstly, an important point must be made: Trump is extremely condescending to Saudi Arabia in the first statement above. Not only does he narcissistically remark that they should have already preemptively lowered oil prices as a kind of genuflection toward his new ascension to power, but then even outright blames the Saudis for starting the Ukraine war—a pretty outrageously extraneous remark. How exactly do you demand various tithes and tributes from a country to the tune of a trillion dollars, all while belittling them?

Needless to say, this alone mark a not-so-optimistic start to Trump’s war-ending plan. Trump appears to be under the impression that he’s still ruling in a previous bygone era—but times have passed him by, other countries are no longer as beholden nor fearful of the US and its big braggadocios threats. Putin has since developed closer ties to the Saudis and it seems hard to imagine they would skip and jump at Trump’s beck and call so easily all to spite Russia, with whom they now have good relations with, highlighted by Saudi Arabia’s recent inclusion into the BRICS fold. ¹

The way Trump has roared onto the scene, demeaning and bullying every country left and right, leaves one to ponder how truly effective his tactic will be in this new world. Denmark, Panama, and Mexico, for instance, have already rebuffed his wild threats, although some reports now claim Denmark is internally in turmoil politically vis-a-vis Greenland.

All in all, it’s still questionable what results Trump’s extremely grating and disrespectful approach will yield, and one surmises that the general concensus of countries treated thusly by Trump will reveal the overall state of the world and direction things will take in the short to medium term. If Trump’s now ‘mythic’-level stature is enough to push countries around all across the globe, it will denote a new muscular American era of global hegemony. But if countries resist, and there begins to be a kind of herd mentality courage that develops, with each subsequent country inheriting boldness from the previous one which demonstrated resistance, then Trump’s new American century may fall flat and be exposed as nothing more than a cheap machismo PR campaign; that of course would subsequently bode very poorly for Ukraine.

So: as per the above, we know Trump is either lazily deluded, or is smarter than we think and is throwing an intentional deflection dart for his enemies. The real mechanism by which Trump aims to bring Russia to its knees is outlined above in two new statements stitched together in this video:

Russia is not afraid of Trump's threats of "super sanctions" and is ready to fight for at least another year, developing its successes on the front, - Wall Street Journal.

▪️Moscow believes that it is successfully resisting sanctions and is capable of withstanding at least another year of conflict.

▪️At the same time, Russia has an advantage on the front, advancing towards Ukraine’s important logistics centers.

➖“...the situation is not so acute as to demand the cessation of all military actions... We are able to insist on our demands... and if Ukraine’s defense continues to collapse, as it is now, it would be wiser for the other side to agree to our conditions,” said HSE expert V. Kashin.

▪️Therefore, Trump's statements "appear to be too few to force Russia to change its core demands." The Kremlin is more likely to view the US president's threats as "posturing before negotiations."

➖"Putin perceives these statements as part of a political game. He does not take them seriously... He is prepared for any scenario and has no illusions that a deal will be reached quickly," says Tatyana Stanovaya, a political scientist at the Carnegie Center.

▪️“Analysts say Putin is seeking a summit with Trump where the two leaders could hammer out a settlement acceptable to Moscow by pushing aside the Ukrainian leadership, which Putin rejects as illegitimate.”

▪️Experts believe that Trump's threat to impose new sanctions reflects his understanding that the deal could be delayed. At the same time, such behavior could "push Russia away from the negotiating table."

▪️“Russians always want to be spoken to directly; the Kremlin was already irritated by his communication style in his first term… This is not how to communicate with Russians,” said Oleg Ignatov, an analyst at the International Crisis Group on conflict resolution.

RVvoenkor

You’ll recall I previously deep-dived these exchange reports here, proving they are real and even recorded in Ukrainian sources.

Last time the ratio ended up at:

Russian losses: 331
Ukrainian losses: 2,790
Ratio: 8.43 to 1

With the new numbers, we are at:

Russian losses: 380
Ukrainian losses: 3,547
Ratio: 9.34 to 1

That’s almost a 10:1 kill ratio.

This is interesting given the new NYT article: