The Perversion of Western Fucking Culture -- 'Culture' as in a Fucked up Bacteria

news (sic) and junk (news) a constant flow on the fucking Fuckerberg Jewish Media and the Google Bar Mitzvah Media

Look at the trash below on Bing “news” feeds, not just the coverage, but the fucking TRASH covered.

Fucking sick mother-fucking Jews of Michigan, Jews of Amerikkka, Jews of the Fucking God’s Fucking Chosen Sicarios. Antisemetic?

A Jewish University of Michigan regent’s law firm in Southfield, Michigan, was vandalized early Monday, spray painted with pro-Palestinian language in what the firm is calling an antisemitic attack.

Jordan Acker, who serves as a regent for the University of Michigan and partner for Goodman Acker, called the crime “an enormously difficult moment for me personally and for this entire community.” A regent is a state official elected to a board that oversees the university’s governance.

Oh, what’s those fucking Jews from BlackRock, BlackStone, and Goldman Sachs saying? US manufacturing activity contracted for the second consecutive month in May, according to industry survey data published today, as demand remained soft.

Fucking dirty Switzerland, yeah, that fuckin White Asshole Viral Country of Monetary Sicarios, leveling their fucking supposed neutrality. No Russia at a peace summit on the proxy war the US set up with Russia in UkroNaziLandia? Hmm, no China, hmm, no India in attendence?

Fucking scabs, the USA and its vassals are.

Do you believe one fucking word from these MicroSoft Monsters? Microsoft has not seen significant use of artificial intelligence in the European Parliamentary elections for creating disinformation campaigns, the company's president told Reuters in an interview.

Brad Smith was in Stockholm to announce Microsoft's plan to invest 33.7 billion Swedish crowns ($3.21 billion) to expand its cloud and artificial intelligence infrastructure in Sweden over a two-year period.

Anthony Mengele.

• For decades, Anthony Fauci, the longtime head of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, who finally testifies today before Congress, was the main advocate for so-called “gain-of-function” lab work. The Biden administration must regard his testimony just now with relief, as it provides a distraction from the general public scrutinizing Biden’s “ceasefire” rhetoric, with that in turn distracting from efforts to have the UN implement the ICJ orders against Israel. “Gain-of-Function” is a euphemism for making pathogens more deadly and/or more easily transmissible. It’s an existential threat to humanity. When over 700 scientists signed a petition against a huge spike in spending on such work following the 2001 false flag anthrax attacks on Congress (which ironically came from US lab work), Fauci effectively told them to shut-up and do the work. See New York Times piece from 2005 — “U.S. Germ-Research Policy Is Protested by 758 Scientists” — which reported that Fauci responded to the concerns of the scientists: “‘The United States through its leaders [that’s Bush/Cheney he’s talking about] made the decision that this money was going to be spent on biodefense,’ Dr. Fauci said. If the institutes had not taken the money, it would have been spent by the Defense Department or the Department of Homeland Security for similar purposes, but without the influence of scientists through the traditional grant-reviewing mechanism of the institutes, Dr. Fauci said.”

Jews or Nazis, take your fucking pick.

“We are particularly distressed by reports that Palestinian women and girls in detention have also been subjected to multiple forms of sexual assault, such as being stripped naked and searched by male Israeli army officers. At least two female Palestinian detainees were reportedly raped while others were reportedly threatened with rape and sexual violence,” the experts said. They also noted that photos of female detainees in degrading circumstances were also reportedly taken by the Israeli army and uploaded online.

Artificial intelligence is being used to erase Palestinians, whether through weaponry against entire populations or in sanitised images that conceal the horrors inflicted on them.

Over the past eight months, we have borne witness to unspeakable horrors stemming from Israel’s war on Gaza.

After its most recent offensive targeting a tent camp for displaced Palestinians in Rafah on 26 May, the world saw a headless baby being held together while bodies turned to ash and fires raged on in the background. Forty-five people were killed that Sunday evening in what was likely a retaliation strike after the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to halt military operations in Rafah.

These apocalyptic scenes were a reminder that Palestinians cannot escape bombardment.

The relentless assault since 7 October has amounted to more than 36,000 Palestinians murdered – not counting those trapped under the rubble – tens of thousands injured and almost two million internally displaced as a result of Israel’s strategic and deliberate violence. These scenes have circulated on social media with unprecedented volume in what has been described as “the first live-streamed genocide”.

There is no shortage of content being transmitted from the heart of Gaza as a testament to the terror unfolding in real-time. Indeed, an unsettling, if predictable, feature in this influencer age is how the brave Palestinian voices documenting and transmitting to the globe have become familiar household names to us all.

The sheer volume of raw, horrific footage circulating on social media means that mainstream outlets have long been displaced as a primary source of news in favour of TikTok, Instagram and X.

We follow the feeds of young people on the ground who not only share imagery but also a window into their lives and personal experiences. We share in their fear and their grief, and we worry for their safety if they have not posted that they survived the night.

In the context of all this, we observed with great interest the speed with which the now-ubiquitous “All Eyes on Rafah” Instagram template became viral.

What are we ameliorating when posting an AI-generated image instead of a real-life one? What exactly are we protecting?

Ahh, the mother fucking STEM fascists. AI? How’s that working out for extreme heat, extreme drought, extreme crop failure, extreme wild fires, extreme poverty, extreme disease, extreme insanity?

During his COMPUTEX keynote, NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang announced that ASRock Rack, ASUS, GIGABYTE, Ingrasys, Inventec, Pegatron, QCT, Supermicro, Wistron and Wiwynn will deliver cloud, on-premises, embedded and edge AI systems using NVIDIA GPUs and networking.

“The next industrial revolution has begun. Companies and countries are partnering with NVIDIA to shift the trillion-dollar traditional data centers to accelerated computing and build a new type of data center — AI factories — to produce a new commodity: artificial intelligence,” said Huang. “From server, networking and infrastructure manufacturers to software developers, the whole industry is gearing up for Blackwell to accelerate AI-powered innovation for every field.”

Monsters, these cunts:

In May, Google announced that the AI-generated summaries, which compile content from news sites and blogs on the topic being searched, would be made available to everyone in the US. And that change has publishing executives worried that the paragraphs pose a big danger to their brittle business model, by sharply reducing the amount of traffic to their sites from Google. “It potentially chokes off the original creators of the content,”  Pine said.

Google’s AI-powered search engine could be ‘catastrophic’ for news publishers, critics warn!

The problem posed by the entanglement of memory and imagination is as old as Western philosophy. Socratic philosophy bequeathed to us two rival and complementary topoi on this subject, one Platonic, the other Aristotelian. The first, centered on the theme of the eik ¯ on, speaks of the present represen- tation of an absent thing; it argues implicitly for enclosing the problematic of memory within that of imagination. The second, centered on the theme of the representation of a thing formerly perceived, acquired, or learned, ar- gues for including the problematic of the image within that of remembering. These are the two versions of the aporia of imagination and memory from which we can never completely extricate ourselves.

Rememeber: Britain’s Opium Trafficking and China’s Century of Humiliation (1839-1949) Stansfield Smith

As per British sources, more than 85 million Indians died in these famines which were in reality genocides done by the British Raj.

For the Chinese, the trauma of the Century of Humiliation continues as a blunt reminder of their past defeat and neo-colonial servitude, as well as a reminder of the West’s self-righteous hypocrisy and arrogance.

In 1500, India and China were the world’s most advanced civilizations. Then came the Europeans. They eventually looted and wreaked havoc on both, just as they were to on the Americas and Africa. For India and China, Britain was the chief culprit, relying on state-sponsored drug-running backed by industrialized military power. The British Empire was the world’s largest producer and exporter of Opium—the main product of global trade after the gradual decline of the slave trade from Africa. Their “civilization” brought the Century of Humiliation to China, which only ended with the popular revolution led by Mao Zedong. This historic trauma and the struggle to overcome it and re-establish their country is etched in the minds of the Chinese today.

Before the British brought their “culture,” 25% of the world trade originated in India. By the time they left it was less than 1%. British India’s Opium dealing was for the large part of the 19th Century the second-most important source of revenue for colonial India. Their “Opium industry was one of the largest enterprises on the subcontinent, producing a few thousand tons of the drug every year—a similar output to Afghanistan’s notorious Opium industry [during the U.S. occupation], which supplies the global market for heroin.” Opium accounted for about 17-20% of British India revenues.